Supreme Court Won’t Stop Texas Abortion Ban, But OKs Clinics’ Suit – N…
What to Know
- Federal estimate likely to review the case again, followed by 5th Circuit.
- State District estimate ruled the law was unconstitutional Thursday but left the law in place.
- The case could once again return to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court ruled that Texas abortion providers can sue over the state’s ban on most abortions, but the justices are allowing the law to keep in effect.
The court acted Friday, more than a month after hearing arguments over the law that makes abortion illegal after cardiac activity is detected in an embryo. That’s around six weeks, before some women already know they are pregnant. There are no exceptions for rape or incest.
The law has been in place since Sept. 1.
The outcome is at best only a uncompletely victory for abortion providers. The same federal estimate who already has once confined the law almost certainly will be asked to do so again. But then his decision will be reviewed by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which has twice voted to allow enforcement of the abortion ban.
The case could return to the justices and so far there have not been five votes on the nine-member court to put the law on keep up while the legal fight plays out.
The court’s conservative majority also seems likely to roll back abortion rights in a Mississippi case that was argued last week, although that decision is not expected until the spring.
The high court ruling came a day after a state court estimate in Texas ruled that the law’s enforcement, which rewards lawsuits against violators by awarding judgments of $10,000, is unconstitutional however left the law in place.
Planned Parenthood famous the state ruling Thursday but said abortion sets nevertheless keep “virtually far away” in Texas, and supporters of the law that was signed by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott said it was doubtful to have any functional impact or already dissuade lawsuits against abortion clinics.
The ruling in state court also has no bearing on the broader and higher-stakes case before the Supreme Court. Abortion providers have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to block the law but it has so far declined to do so.
The vote was 8 to 1 in favor of allowing the lawsuit to proceed, with only Justice Clarence Thomas voting the other way.
The court fight over the Texas law is focused on its uncommon structure and whether it improperly limits how the law can be challenged in court. Texas lawmakers handed responsibility for enforcing the law to private citizens, instead of state officials.
The law authorizes lawsuits against clinics, doctors and anyone who “aids or abets” an abortion performed after cardiac activity is detected in the fetus. That’s usually around six weeks of pregnancy before some women already know they are pregnant.
The case raised a complicate set of issues about who, if anyone, can sue over the law in federal court, the typical route for challenges to abortion restrictions. Indeed, federal courts ordinarily put a keep up on similar laws, which rely on traditional enforcement by state and local authorities.
The court was divided 5-4, with conservatives in the majority, on another knotty issue, whom to target with a court order that ostensibly tries to block the law. The court ruled that Texas licensing officials may be sued, but dismissed claims against state court judges, court clerks and Attorney General Ken Paxton.
Chief Justice John Roberts and the three liberal justices dissented from that part of the decision in an opinion that said the purpose of the Texas law was “to nullify this court’s rulings” on abortion.
“The character of the federal right infringed does not matter; it is the role of the Supreme Court in our constitutional system that is at stake,” Roberts wrote.
In a separate opinion, Justice Sonia Sotomayor chastised her colleagues for what she said was “delay” in the case that has had “extreme consequences for women seeking to exercise their constitutional right to an abortion in Texas.” She said the court’s decision closed off the most direct route to challenging the law and would “clear the way” for other states to “reprise and perfect Texas’ scheme in the future to target the exercise of any right recognized by this court with which they disagree.”
Since it took effect in September, the law has imposed t he most restrictive abortion curbs in the nation since the Supreme Court first declared a woman’s right to an abortion in its 1973 Roe v. Wade decision.
In its first month of operation, a study published by researchers at the University of Texas found that the number of abortions statewide fell by 50% compared with September 2020. The study was based on data from 19 of the state’s 24 abortion clinics, according to the Texas Policy Evaluation Project.
Texas residents who left the state seeking an abortion also have had to travel well beyond nearby states, where clinics cannot keep up with the increase in patients from Texas, according to a separate study by the Guttmacher Institute.
The justices declined to block the law once before, voting 5-4 in September to let it take effect. At the time, the three appointees of former President Donald Trump and two other conservative colleagues formed the majority.
Following the September vote, the Justice Department filed its own lawsuit over the Texas law. The justices on Friday dismissed that suit, which raised a separate set of thorny legal issues.
Click: See details