Are Land Investments Affected by the Libor Rate-Fixing Scandal?

Are Land Investments Affected by the Libor Rate-Fixing Scandal?




How does the Libor rate-fixing scandal affect capital growth investments such as land?

Stringent lending practices by edges are blamed for the housing shortage in the UK. Might the LIBOR scandal, uncovered in 2012, play a role in this?

While residential real estate prices in London keep high and climbing, most other parts of the UK have seen a meaningful drop in home values since the financial crisis of 2008. Economists and pundits alike have pegged this to many factors in the economy, but since the Libor (London Interbank Offered Rate) rate fixing scandal came to light in 2012, some voices are questioning the degree to which this may have then, and since, affected home buyers. Of course by extension, the ability to buy homes affects the fortunes of strategic land investors and developers.

A Fortune magazine senior editor wrote in late 2012 that because the housing market crash was due to many homeowners being unable to pay their mortgages, that Libor manipulations “additional to the borrowers’ hardships,” making it at the minimum a contributing factor.

Other voices argue that the damage of Libor manipulations benefited just as many people as it may have hurt. As much as rates were artificially inflated, just a bit, so too were they pushed down (pushed by the bankers found to be responsible for their own reasons). It should not go without notice that about 45 percent of adjustable-rate chief mortgages and 80 percent of adjustable subprime mortgages are set according to the Libor rate. Student and auto loan rates are hitched to Libor in addition.

But if there is one outcome of the scandal, it may have been the undermining of trust in the system overall. It certainly shakes investor confidence in the financial markets.

Billion-pound-plus settlements have been reached by those edges found responsible (Barclays, UBS, Royal Bank of Scotland. American edges including Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America have not faced charges). And new regulations in the aftermath are expected, with some variation between countries and their respective regulatory systems. In the UK, that may follow the Vickers proposals, which the International Center for Financial Regulation says will put ringfences around all UK-based retail and investment banking sets.

While the punitive settlements reached between UK regulators and the edges sound hefty, comparatively speaking they pale in comparison to the costs borne by borrowers since the fraudulent practices began in the early 1990s. According to the website ThisIsMoney.co.UK, small businesses’ and households’ annual mortgages were affected by hundreds of pounds each year due these transgressions. Consider how, says the site, Libor and consequently mortgage rates soared in the rule up to the 2008 financial crisis, particularly its climb around August 2007.

The credit crunch and housing price crash since has slowed investments of all kinds, not the least of which has been home building in England and Wales – despite a continued population increase and distinct shortage of housing. Would-be new homeowners have difficulty meeting tighter lending standards, which has dulled the interests of most developers in building new homes.

As confidence builds again in the edges, and as lending loosens up, there is growing interest in the pent-up need for housing that has occurred. In the meantime, to-let housing is becoming more shared in the UK and in other places, particularly with new construction. The dynamics of banking and business, and the population increase, all suggest that home building has to increase in the future – perhaps this time, with fairer, less-manipulated lending rates. When that does, capital growth for landowners, land investors, and existing built-character owners should assistance in addition. On the receiving end, more young people and families will be able to find a place to live – and pensioner parents will reclaim their homes for themselves once again.

For all considered, all market factors must be taken into account. The smart investor will always consult with a qualified personal financial planner to ensure the risk profile of an investment is tolerable and complementary to other assets in his or her portfolio.




leave your comment

Search

Top